Case file No.078 · pypi · stdio

Verdict QA

io.github.ArtJack/verdict · v0.92.0

Read-only MCP server over Verdict QA state: verdicts, findings, flaky quarantine, history.

Package ↗GitHub ↗

Security score

96/100

Strong

Normalized over 100 points of available evidence.

Score breakdown

Known advisories40/40

0 affecting current version, 0 historical

Maintenance20/20

last push 1 days ago

Source transparency15/15

public repo, license MIT

Metadata stability15/15

0 risky metadata change(s) without a version bump

Adoption6/10

1424 weekly downloads

Known advisories

source: OSV.dev

No advisories found in OSV for this package name. (Not proof of safety.)

Metadata change timeline

rug-pull detection

v0.91.1 → v0.92.0Oct 19, 2026
- version changed version bump
```
"0.91.1" → "0.92.0"
```
- packages.0.version changed package version bump
```
"0.91.1" → "0.92.0"
```
v0.90.10 → v0.91.1Oct 18, 2026
- version changed version bump
```
"0.90.10" → "0.91.1"
```
- packages.0.version changed package version bump
```
"0.90.10" → "0.91.1"
```
v0.90.9 → v0.90.10Oct 17, 2026
- version changed version bump
```
"0.90.9" → "0.90.10"
```
- packages.0.version changed package version bump
```
"0.90.9" → "0.90.10"
```
First snapshot (v0.90.9)Oct 17, 2026

Tool lists: not published by the registry — unknown.

FAQ

auto-generated from the data above

Is Verdict QA safe?

MCPWatch gives Verdict QA a heuristic security score of 96/100 (strong), based on 100 points of available evidence. This is an automated heuristic, not an audit.

Does Verdict QA have known CVEs or vulnerabilities?

No advisories were found in OSV.dev for the pypi package verdict-qa-mcp. That is not proof of safety.

When was Verdict QA last updated?

The latest registry version is 0.92.0, published Oct 19, 2026. The last push to ArtJack/verdict was on Oct 20, 2026. MCPWatch last checked it on Oct 21, 2026.

What license does Verdict QA use?

GitHub reports the license of ArtJack/verdict as MIT.

Related servers

same publisher / similar score